|
A)
A medium sized
company of around 75 employees consulted EMDS and its colleagues to design and implement a
compensation program from scratch. They didn’t know how they were positioned
in the job market in terms of paying their employees, and most people who
joined the company were paid on the basis of their salary history and
negotiating skills.
Incorporating employee
input, we began the consulting engagement by writing job descriptions that
described what each staff member did in their jobs every day, and addressing
all relevant legal and compliance issues. We followed up by conducting a
salary survey of jobs in the same industry, matching Occupations to the market
based upon job content, not just title.
Using market data, we
developed salary structures that allowed us to level jobs across the
organisation. We then slotted the jobs into the new structures. We reviewed
each person’s pay against the salary survey results to determine appropriate
pays levels for all employees.
To ease employees' anxiety
about the process, managers met individually with their employees to
clarify how they were impacted by the project.
Most employees received a
copy of their updated job description and had no change in their pay. Some
employees received increases to bring them in line with market rates, and
others who were already high in their salary range placement continued to
enjoy the benefit of receiving above market pay until others could catch up
with them over time.
As a result of this
compensation consulting engagement, the company clearly understood their pay
position in relation to the market. They knew which jobs to keep at current
pay levels, and which jobs they should adjust to retain employees. Most
importantly, the company was able to better control its salary and merit pay
budgets, normally the largest expense for any company.
Is your compensation
plan appropriate for your company? Do you lose candidates and employees to
competitors? Are your jobs market priced? Too many HR professionals can't
answer those basic questions.
Contact Elizabeth
at EMDS today, and we will gladly work with you to solve these issues ***
B)
A
Non-Profit Organisation - Once it had grown to 35 employees, a non-profit sales and marketing association realised that many necessary HR processes
and functions were simply non-existent. The organisation had essentially
outgrown itself.
The organisation hired EMDS
to conduct an audit of current staff, functions and processes to determine
exactly what it would have to do to establish a professional HR Department.
EMDS HR then
conducted a search to recruit a new Human Resources Manager for the firm.
Audit results were to be used to develop a first-year business plan for the
newly established HR Department.
During the first phase of
the consulting engagement, we spent time on-site talking with staff and
reviewing processes and files to determine the current status of all aspects
of Human Resources Management. We examined everything HR-related: from
recruiting processes, to their benefits package, to internal employee
communications. (One of our quick wins: posting frequently used forms on the
company intranet, giving employees instant access.)
No stone was left unturned in this comprehensive
review. Then, in a meeting with the CEO, EMDS delivered the audit
results and helped him in clarifying his short-term priorities for the HR
function.
Simultaneously, we began the recruiting process for
the new HR Manager. We talked with senior management about the technical
competencies they sought in this position, and explored what personal
attributes in a candidate would result in a “good fit” with the association.
We consulted closely with management until we sincerely understood what
qualities they wanted in an ideal candidate.
We then wrote a job
description and created a position profile. EMDS advertised the job, received and reviewed
numerous resumes, and interviewed the most technically qualified candidates.
The CEO and additional staff then interviewed the final three candidates,
using questions we developed for them.
All three final candidates
was so highly qualified that the management team had a difficult time
determining which applicant to hire. So EMDS brought the final candidate back in for a third interview
with a cross-section of the staff, just to make sure she was a good fit with
the people who already worked there.
The organisation's
preferred candidate accepted the offer. Once she was in place in her new
position, EMDS supported her in
developing the business plan for the HR department, identifying and mapping
out deliverable projects for the next year.
Is your company relying on "improvisational" human
resources to muddle through? Are you 100% sure you're in legal compliance?
Do you have a qualified, professional HR staff in place?
Contact Elizabeth
at EMDS Today..
C)
Another non-profit organisation called in EMDS for a
consultation to determine how to better support its front-line managers in
the delivery of services to clients. Other management objectives were to
increase efficiencies across the organisation by identifying redundancies
and streamlining processes, without reducing staff. The client also wanted
to position their organisation for growth.
To assess these concerns
and identify patterns, we designed a questionnaire for key employees to
complete. After evaluating the returned questionnaires, we held week-long
focus groups and individual interviews to review and confirm questionnaire
content. We asked questions, and we listened. EMDS extensively reviewed and assessed the data to
identify problem areas in organisational structure, processes, and
procedures. Lastly, based on principles of human resource excellence, we
developed a comprehensive report, capturing the areas of concern in each
division.
In the final analysis, we
discovered that the Human Resources division was operating from a
“policeman” mentality within the organisation. They thought their role was
to act as a gatekeeper rather than providing managers with alternatives to
help them accomplish their goals and objectives. Because their department's
role had been to minimise legal exposure for the organisation, Human
Resources employees failed to understand how they could effectively operate
as internal consultants.
Since they were currently a
barrier rather than a benefit to achieving business objectives, EMDS recommended a
restructuring of the Human Resources department.
EMDS drafted job descriptions and
organisational charts reflecting the new roles and delivered them to the
company’s senior management team for their consideration. We determined that
the current staff in HR did not possess the skills necessary to carry out
the newly defined roles, and recommended the replacement of existing HR
staff with a more progressive team.
When the HR consultation began, no one foresaw the
need for a complete reorganisation of the company’s HR department. But our
analysis revealed an HR team with systemic personnel and procedural
problems…an old-fashioned HR department that did not support its employees
or management team, but was purely administrative in nature.
Senior management adopted and implemented the
organisational structure suggested by EMDS. With the changes and new HR
staff in place, the senior management team expected a significant reduction
in the stress level and workload of the Program Managers — leading to a
sharp decline in employee turnover. This in turn was expected to improve
service delivery to clients. The organisation also expected to reduce costs
and increase efficiency as the Program Managers' paperwork burden was
reduced.
Are your HR processes and people an asset or a
liability to your organisation? Does your HR team support your company's
bottom line?
Contact Elizabeth
for a comprehensive audit of your organisation's HR capabilities…
|